Residential sales agency
Browse records within Residential sales agency
- AA Dickson & Co v O'Leary
- Ackroyd & Sons v Hasan
- Adamson v Jarvis
- AL Wilkinson Ltd v Brown
- Andrew v Ramsay & Co
- Antonelli v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Armstrong v Strain
- Atkins v AD Kennedy & Co Ltd
- Atlantic Estates Ltd v Ezekiel
- Aylesford & Co (Estate Agents) Ltd v Al-Habtoor
- Bairstow Eves London Central Ltd v Smith
- Barker v Levinson
- Benham and Reeves v Christensen
- Bennett, Walden & Co v Wood
- Bentall, Horsley and Baldry v Vicary
- Blake & Co v Sohn
- Boote v RT Shiels & Co
- Boots v E Christopher & Co
- Bow's Emporium Ltd v AR Brett & Co Ltd
- Brennan v O'Connell
- Brian Cooper & Co v Fairview Estates (Investments) Ltd
- Brutton v Alfred Savill, Curtis & Henson
- Chamberlain & Willows v Rose
- Chaskill Ltd v Marina Developments Ltd
- Chris Hart (Business Sales) Ltd v Mitchell
- Christie Owen & Davies (t/a Christie & Co) v Jones
- Christie Owen & Davies Ltd v Stockton
- Christie Owen & Davies plc v King
- Christie Owen & Davies v Rapacioli
- Coles v Enoch
- Collen v Wright
- Collins v Howell-Jones
- Computastaff Ltd v Ingledew Brown Bennison & Garrett
- Cremdean Properties Ltd v Nash
- Cunningham v Herbert Fulford & Chorley
- Day Morris Associates v Voyce
- Debenham Tewson & Chinnocks v Rimington
- Dennis Reed Ltd v Goody
- Dowling Kerr Ltd v Scott
- Drewery and Drewery v Ware-Lane
- Duncan Investments Ltd v Underwoods
- Dunton Properties Ltd v Coles Knapp & Kennedy Ltd
- Edmonds v Andrew & Ashwell
- Egan Lawson Ltd v Standard Life Assurance Co
- Enfield London Borough Council v Castles Estate Agents Ltd
- EP Nelson & Co v Rolfe
- Eric V Stansfield v South East Nursing Home Services Ltd
- Espley v Williams
- Fairvale Ltd v Sabharwal
- Faruk v Wyse
- Fiesta Girl of London Ltd v Network Agencies
- Foxtons v Pelkey-Bicknell and Anor
- FP Rolfe & Co v George
- Fullwood v Hurley
- Galinski v McHugh
- Glentree Estates Ltd v Gee
- Gordon v Selico Co Ltd
- Gosling v Anderson
- GP & P v Bulcraig
- Graham and Scott (Southgate) Ltd v Oxlade
- Graylaw Investments Ltd v JR Bridgford & Sons
- Green v Bartlett
- Gregory v Fearn
- Griffin & Son v Cheesewright
- Gross Fine & Krieger Chalfen v Clifton
- Gross Fine & Krieger Chalfen v Gaynor
- Hampton & Sons v George
- Harrods Ltd v Lemon
- Hartnell, Taylor, Cook v Bromwich
- Henry Smith & Son v Muskett
- Hill v Harris
- Hoddell v Smith
- Horsham Properties v Clark & Beech
- Jackson v Packham Real Estate Ltd et al.
- Jaques v Lloyd D George & Partners
- John D Wood v Dantata
- John McCann & Co v Pow
- Jones v Lowe
- Jones v Phipps
- Keen v Mear
- Kelly v Cooper
- Kenney v Hall, Pain & Foster
- Keppel v Wheeler
- Knight Frank & Rutley v Randolph
- Kooragang Investments Pty Ltd v Richardson & Wrench Ltd
- Lady Manor Ltd v Fat Cat Cafe Bars Ltd
- Lancashire County Council v Buchanan
- Lemmerbell Ltd v Britannia LAS Direct Ltd
- Lester v Adrian Barr & Co Ltd
- Levers v Dunsdon
- Lewin v Barratt Homes Ltd
- Lewis & Graves v Harper
- Lloyd v Grace Smith & Co
- London Mews Co Ltd v Burney
- Lordsgate Properties v Balcombe
- Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper
- McCallum v Hicks
- McCullagh v Lane Fox & Partners Ltd
- McInnes v Clarke
- Michael Harwood t/a RSBS Group v Smith
- Midgley Estates Ltd v Hand
- Millar, Son & Co v Radford
- Mullens v Miller
- Murray v Sturgis
- Navarro v Moregrand Ltd
- Overbrooke Estates Ltd v Glencombe Properties Ltd
- Papé v Westacott
- Pearse v Boulter
- Peel Developments (South) Ltd v Siemens plc
- Peter Long & Partners v Burns
- Peterson v Moloney
- Poole v Clarke & Co
- Prebble & Co v West
- Property Choice Ltd v Fronda
- R v Commission for Racial Equality, ex parte Cottrell and Rothon (a firm)
- R v Director General of Fair Trading, ex parte Benhams Ltd
- R v Docklands Estates Ltd
- Raja v Austin Gray
- Regina v Bexley Justices ex part Barratt Homes Ltd
- Registered Holdings v Kadri
- Richard Ellis v Pipe-Chem (Holdings) Ltd
- Rimmer v Knowles
- Robert Baxendale v Davstone Holdings Ltd
- Robinson Scammell & Co v Ansell
- Rosenbaum v Belson
- Saleh v Robinson
- Salomons v Pender
- Saunders v Soper
- Savills Land & Property Ltd v Kibble
- Scheggia v Gradwell
- Silven Properties v Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Sinclair Goldsmith v Minero Peru Commercial
- Smith v Eric S Bush
- Smith v Land and House Property Corporation
- Solicitors' Estate Agency (Glasgow) Ltd v MacIver
- Sorrell v Finch
- South Western General Property Co Ltd v Marton
- Spiers v Taylor
- Spiro v Lintern
- St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Payne
- Thuman v Best
- Toor v Bassi
- Toulmin v Millar
- Townsends Carriers Ltd v Pfizer Ltd
- Tredinnick v Browne
- Trinder (John E) & Partners v Haggis
- Walsh v Griffiths-Jones and Durant
- Way & Waller v Ryde
- Whiteman v Weston
- Withey Robinson v Edwards
- Worboys v Carter
- Wragg v Lovatt