• Skip to content
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Newsletter sign-up
  • Login / Register
RICS logo RICS iSurv logo isurv
Advanced search
Channels Show the navigation
  • APC and AssocRICS
  • Building surveying
  • Commercial property
  • Construction
  • Infrastructure
  • Planning
  • Professional conduct
  • Residential
  • Rural
  • Sustainability
  • Valuation
You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Cases
  3. Defects claims

Cases

Defects claims

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
A
  • Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown
B
  • Brown v W Midlands Patio Doors Ltd
C
  • Colbart v Kumar
  • Crown Estate Commissioners v John Mowlem and Co. Ltd
G
  • G W Atkins Ltd v Scott
H
  • H W Nevill (Sunblest) v William Press
L
  • Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd
M
  • Matthew Hall Ortech Ltd v Tarmac Roadstone Ltd
  • Merton London Borough v Lowe
  • Murphy v Brentwood District Council
P
  • Pearce & High Ltd v Mr & Mrs Baxter
R
  • Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth
S
  • St Martins Property Corporation Ltd v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd
W
  • William Tompkinson v The Parochial Church Council of St Michael
Y
  • Yarmouth v France
  • Resources

    Resources

    • Document templates
    • RICS standards
    • Cases
    Close tab
  • Ask isurv

    Ask isurv

    • Fill in the form
    Close tab
RICS logo RICS iSurv logo isurv
  • © 2025 isurv

  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Accessibility
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy policy

Suppliers

  • Designed and Powered by Jadu.
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn