Colbart v Kumar

This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

[1992] 59 BLR 89 This matter concerned the execution of refurbishment works carried out under the JCT IFC form of contract. The principal issue concerned the ability of Kuma (the employer) to recover for defects after the final certificate had been issued. The court held that: ...

To continue reading, start your free trial here. Please note your trial does not include access to downloads. To explore our subscription options and access downloads, please click here.

Or sign up to the isurv newsletter, your monthly round up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.