Colbart v Kumar

This document is only available to subscribers.

[1992] 59 BLR 89 This matter concerned the execution of refurbishment works carried out under the JCT IFC form of contract. The principal issue concerned the ability of Kuma (the employer) to recover for defects after the final certificate had been issued. The court held that: ...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here