Colbart v Kumar

This document is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

[1992] 59 BLR 89 This matter concerned the execution of refurbishment works carried out under the JCT IFC form of contract. The principal issue concerned the ability of Kuma (the employer) to recover for defects after the final certificate had been issued. The court held that: ...

Sign up for a free trial here. Please note that the free trial does not include access to downloads.

Or sign up to the isurv bulletin, our monthly newsletter detailing the latest content on isurv.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.