• Skip to content
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Newsletter sign-up
  • Login / Register
RICS logo RICS iSurv logo isurv
Advanced search
Channels Show the navigation
  • APC and AssocRICS
  • Building surveying
  • Commercial property
  • Construction
  • Infrastructure
  • Planning
  • Professional conduct
  • Residential
  • Rural
  • Sustainability
  • Valuation
You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Cases
  3. Boundary matters

Cases

Boundary matters

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
A
  • Asquith v Griffen
B
  • Bernstein v Skyviews
  • Buckinghamshire County Council v Moran
E
  • Eastwood v Ashton
  • Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England's Conveyance
  • Evans v Angell
H
  • Hopwood v Brown
I
  • Inglewood Investments Co Ltd v Baker
  • Inwards v Baker
J
  • J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham
K
  • Kelson v Imperial Tobacco
  • Kynock v Rowlands
L
  • Lambeth London Borough Council v Jack Blackburn
  • Leachman v L & K Richardson Ltd
M
  • Markfield Investments Ltd v Evans
  • Minting v Ramage
N
  • National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd: The Ikarian Reefer
  • Neilson v Poole
R
  • Re Sharpe
S
  • Savill Bros. Ltd v Bethell
  • Scarfe v Adams
  • St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance v Clarke (No. 2)
  • St John's Church, Bishop's Hatfield
W
  • Wiggington & Milner Ltd v Winster Engineering Ltd
  • Williams v Usherwood
  • Resources

    Resources

    • RICS standards
    • Cases
    • Features archive
    Close tab
  • Ask isurv

    Ask isurv

    • Fill in the form
    Close tab
RICS logo RICS iSurv logo isurv
  • © 2025 isurv

  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Accessibility
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy policy

Suppliers

  • Designed and Powered by Jadu.
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn