Harrods Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions

This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

[2002] EWCA Civ 412 Planning control Harrods claimed that the use of the store roof, for the taking off and landing of a helicopter for its chairman to get to and from work, was ancillary as there was a functional connection between the landing pad...

To continue reading, start your free trial here. Please note your trial does not include access to downloads. To explore our subscription options and access downloads, please click here.

Or sign up to the isurv newsletter, your monthly round up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.