Harrods Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions

This document is only available to subscribers.

[2002] EWCA Civ 412 Planning control Harrods claimed that the use of the store roof, for the taking off and landing of a helicopter for its chairman to get to and from work, was ancillary as there was a functional connection between the landing pad...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here