Proctor and Gamble Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
(1992) 63 P&CR 317
The Court of
Appeal held in this case that a CPO made for one purpose could not
lawfully be confirmed for another purpose, or for a purpose additional
to that for which the order was made.
The Tyne and Wear
Development Corporation had made a CPO for...
Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for 1 month!
You can now get unlimited access to all isurv channels with our 1-month pass, available for only £75. To find out more, enquire with our team using our form.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further support, please contact us by emailing isurv@rics.org or calling +44 (0) 247 686 8584