Day v Ost

This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

[1973] 2 NZLR 385 Contract adminsitration The New Zealand Supreme Court considered an allegation that an architect had assumed a duty of care to a subcontractor by giving him an assurance that he would be paid by the employer. The plaintiff, a block-laying and plastering subcontractor,...

To continue reading, start your free trial here. Please note your trial does not include access to downloads. To explore our subscription options and access downloads, please click here.

Or sign up to the isurv newsletter, your monthly round up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.