Day v Ost

This document is only available to subscribers.

[1973] 2 NZLR 385 Contract adminsitration The New Zealand Supreme Court considered an allegation that an architect had assumed a duty of care to a subcontractor by giving him an assurance that he would be paid by the employer. The plaintiff, a block-laying and plastering subcontractor,...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here