Clay v Crump

This document is only available to subscribers.

[1963] 3 WLR 866 Contract administration The defendant architect was employed to supervise a demolition and building operation. The demolition contractors left a wall in an unsafe condition. The architect should have known it was unsafe, but he failed to examine it properly and instructed that it should be left...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here