Clay v Crump

This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

[1963] 3 WLR 866 Contract administration The defendant architect was employed to supervise a demolition and building operation. The demolition contractors left a wall in an unsafe condition. The architect should have known it was unsafe, but he failed to examine it properly and instructed that it should be left...

To continue reading, start your free trial here. Please note your trial does not include access to downloads. To explore our subscription options and access downloads, please click here.

Or sign up to the isurv newsletter, your monthly round up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.