Alexander Corfield v David Grant

This information is only available to paying isurv subscribers.

(1992) 59 BLR 102 Contract administration When considering the question of what was sufficient supervision for the architect to have undertaken, the judge said that it should be asked 'whether it was enough ... The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Was the attention given enough for...

To continue reading, start your free trial here. Please note your trial does not include access to downloads. To explore our subscription options and access downloads, please click here.

Or sign up to the isurv newsletter, your monthly round up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.