Alexander Corfield v David Grant

This document is only available to subscribers.

(1992) 59 BLR 102 Contract administration When considering the question of what was sufficient supervision for the architect to have undertaken, the judge said that it should be asked 'whether it was enough ... The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Was the attention given enough for...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here