Alexander Corfield v David Grant
This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.
(1992) 59 BLR 102 Contract administration When considering the question of what was sufficient supervision for the architect to have undertaken, the judge said that it should be asked 'whether it was enough ... The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Was the attention given enough for...Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.
Try isurv for free!
You can get instant access to a free, 7-day trial of isurv simply by filling in the free trial form. Please note that the free trial includes full access to isurv with the exception of downloadable content which is only available with a paid subscription.
Sign up for the isurv newsletter, to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.
For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.