Bridle v Ruby

This document is only available to subscribers.

[1989] QB 169 Right of light - Prescription Act 1832 The plaintiff (the owner of no. 13) and his predecessor mistakenly believed that the conveyance of no. 13 expressly contained a right of way over the driveway of no. 12 and had used the right of...

This page is only available to isurv subscribers. Sign up for a free-trial to access this content.

Alternatively, you can gain access now and purchase isurv online here