Cases - R v Teignbridge DC, ex parte Teignmouth Quay Co. Ltd

Record details

Name
R v Teignbridge DC, ex parte Teignmouth Quay Co. Ltd
Date
[1995]
Citation
2 PLR 1
Legislation
Keywords
Planning control
Summary

Before serving a planning contravention notice (PCN), it must appear to the LPA that there has been a breach of planning control. The LPA cannot serve a PCN just because some other body believes there to have been a breach.

In this case there was nothing to suspect that the development was outside the General Development Order, but the LPA served a PCN, probably with a view to:

  • appeasing local residents who had objected to the development; and
  • satisfing the Teignmouth Harbour Environmental Co-ordinating Committee, which had doubts about the legality of the development.

The Teignmouth Quay Co. successfully sought a court order to quash the PCN. The judge observed that the LPA must reach its own conclusion as to whether there may have been a breach of planning control, and refusal by a landowner to co-operate with inquiries by a council is not sufficient, on its own, to satisfy the minimal statutory requirements without which the contravention notice may not be served.