David Michael Lusty v Finsbury Securities Ltd

This document is only available with a paid isurv subscription.

[1991] 58 BLR 66, CA Expert witness In this case (a claim by an architect for professional fees) the defendant argued that the architect’s evidence about the value of his work was inadmissible as he was an interested party. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument....

Explore the subscription options here to get full access to isurv, including downloads.

Try isurv for free!

You can get instant access to a free, 7-day trial of isurv simply by filling in the free trial form. Please note that the free trial includes full access to isurv with the exception of downloadable content which is only available with a paid subscription.

Sign up for the isurv newsletter, to receive a monthly round-up of the latest isurv updates.

For further questions, don't hesitate to call: +44(0)247 686 8555.